Application of the PRECEDE PROCEED Model to Fit Kids Fit Families FKFF Youth Physical Activity Campaign Essay

Obesity among American jejunenesss has become a national epidemic. both developed and developing nations face a crisis of rising trends of corpulency and exercising weighty among adolescent youths (Centers for illness Control and Prevention, 2004). Approximately 10 % of prepargon children atomic number 18 sarcoid with US alone reporting 25 % of hard children opus 11 % of them ar obese (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004). Preliminary randomness from the National wellness and Nutrition Survey (NHANES), strong evidence of overeight and corpulency is linked to increase mortality and morbidity in United States. Likewise, Houston incision of Health and benignant Sciences reports that the prevalence of overweight and fleshiness among youths of seasons 14-18 is 34.4 % comp ard to the Hispanic youths of 37 % and African American at 23.5 % of similar age assembly (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2004). As such, the Fit Kids Fit Families has launche d a national affectionate marketing to extend aw arness of somatogenic body process as a preventive measure of corpulency and overweight. Fit Kids Fit Families group was founded in 2003, purposefully for promoting optimal weight and improving life quality among the African American batch. The FKFF has selected activity as the target demeanour with the middle instill youths as the target audience. The group mimics the PRECEDE-PROCEED assume in several shipway to provide material activity incumbrance. As such, this paper describes the efforts of the group deep down the context of PRECEDE-PROCEED example as described by Green and Kreuter (2005). word form 1 Quality of Life diagnosingYouths suffer numerous consequences of corpulency due to increased overweight and obesity. Polhamus, Dalenius, Thompson, Scanlon, Borland, Smith & Grummer- Strawn, (2003) writes that the excess body calories are converted into fats and finally stored in adipose tissue thus accumulates in the body of the youth. The individual is likely to develop a suffering humongous body due to additional weight that adds more flesh. The children suffering from obesity are at take a chance of infection of contacting multiple adverse health complications, somewhat of which are fatal. Previous studies observe that mettlesome blood pressure tour childhood is a weak predictor of premature death however, high cholesterol had no relationship with early bereavement. Besides, health experts admit that factors cause obesity and high cholesterol were easier to control through exercise and medication. Researchers come identified children as the rapidly growing demographic in the spheric overweight population. For instance, approximately 31.9 percent of African American youths in take hold body indices that categorize them as overweight. Also, Polhamus et al. (2003) reports that 12 percent of obese people are likely to suffer from anxiety, impaired social interaction 17 %, and depres sion 34 %. phase angle 2 Epidemiological DiagnosisThe take exception of overweight and obesity epidemic is non limited to concerns about weight and bulk. According to Polhamus et al. (2003), 7 % of cases of obesity have resulted into disabilities through physiologic and psychological points of view. The increased waist to hip girth ratio is linked to increased risk of hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and hypertension. Likewise, obesity and overweight has been related to elevated risk of cancer, sleep apnea, musculoskeletal disorders, gallbladder disease, diverticulitis, and intracranial hypertension. Research try outs that the prevalence of obesity among American youths has increased from 5 % to 12.4 % in this meter period and the age group of 14 18 years it has increased from 6.4 % to 17 % (CDC, 2009). From the point of view of health, 20 % of youths have been reported to exhibit clinical obesity and overweight characteristics.Phase 3 Behavioural and Environme ntal DiagnosisIn declination 2014, NHANES provided FKFF with summary of current data to assist them narrow to the target behaviour and audience for social marketing intervention. Therefore, FKFF decided to prevent obesity among youths that were separate into pre-school, middle school, elementary school, and high school. Since obesity has numerous environmental and behavioural determinants and because appropriate interventions may differ between the groups, it was significant to narrow the focus. entropy presented by NHANES provides that 15.3 % of pre-school, 13.9 % of elementary school, 22.8% of middle school and 13.6% of high school youths are either slightly overweight or overweight. Also, 12.5 % of pre-school, 15.9 % of elementary school, 3.2 % of middle school and 10.5 % of high school youths are extremely overweight or overweight Polhamus et al. (2003) reports. Because the FKFF was aware that they would be using social marketing for obesity prevention, the information conce rning developmental and cognitive characteristics of every age group assist in narrowing to the high school as the target group.Further, FKFF chose fleshly activity as the target behaviour. The potential behavioural objectives were based on the objects make up by health People 2010 related to physical activity. According to Health people 2010, national behavioural objectives of physical activity were to increase the youth proportion that participates in moderate physical activity for at least 30 minutes, 3-5 times a week. Secondly, it aimed to increase the proportion of youths engaging in vigorous physical activity that promotes cardiorespiratory fitness 4-5 times a week for 20 minutes per occasion. Lastly, Healthy People 2010 supports the increase in proportion of adolescent that participate in daily school physical education.The FKFF underwent formal environmental diagnosis in where the community researchers collected data to determine places youth say they participate in physi cal activity.Phase 4 Educational DiagnosisGreen et al. (2005) described that enabling factors, predisposing factors, and reinforcing factors are the three major broad categories of factors influencing health behavior. The predisposing factors include motivation, desire for competition, parents and peers. Likewise, the barriers to physical activity included poor body image and desire not to mess up makeup hair. The influencing enabling factors included the availability of facilities and the chance to showcase talent while barriers of enabling factors were homework and V and figurer games. Lastly, influencers of the reinforcing factors were active people on TV and peers while the barriers included self-concept and poor body image.Phase 5 & 6 Policy and Administration Diagnosis and ImplementationThe goal of intervention alignment is to try and fit the fractions of intervention curriculum with various micro and macro-ecological directs of community. The key terms in this PRECEDE-PRO CEED model are mapping. Matching, pooling, and patching where the ecological levels are matched to intervention components, where evidence is lacking, interventions that show promise are patched to fill the gaps, practice-based intervention programs are mapped to health problem determinants and evidence-based intervention are pooled and reviewed (Polhamus, Dalenius, Thompson, Scanlon, Borland, Smith & Grummer- Strawn, 2003). Therefore, the FKFF pooled and reviewed numerously existing physical intervention programs.The administrative assessment includes resource assessment needed to implement the program, incorporating timeline developmental and budget. FKFF personnel reviewed the steps of community based prevention marketing and communicated time involved in the development of evidence-based intervention. Likewise, the committee prepared a yearly budget with consultation from the healthy people department. The appraisal of the organization implementing the program highlighted the co mmitment of FKFF consistency in obesity intervention program.The scorecard wing program of FKFF is in the beginning stages of implementation. The members of the group continue to actively levy members who will in turn provide incentives for youth to participate in physical activity through the reduced cost programs. www.fkff.com has been developed to provide information to the youth. Also, the local radio network has ben contacted for media coverage of the program. Finally, YMCA locations are bushel for free in the country to promote cool, sport opportunities for youths to be active. Recently, FKFF staffed lively graduates from universities to provide a cool appearance and direct the youth fun and creative activities as well as providing ideas on creating fun without sports equipment. The programs for local events are underway with the recreation and parks department commencing the summer scorecard with youth beach run.Phases 7, 8, & 9Process, Impact, and Outcome EvaluationTh e quantitative component of the evaluation seeks to provide answers for number of youths recruited, website hits, and youths registered, local events, and youths that participated in the grand finale. The group designed impact evaluation to determine if the behavioural objectives set are being met and will consist of the qualitative component. Impact evaluation addresses the level of a moderate increase in moderate and vigorous physical activity among the youths. Likewise, it will determine the level of physical education among the youths. This provides the achievements of health objective through quantitative measures. This provides answers for decrease or increase of risk for overweight among the youths. The baseline data obtained from the Healthy People 2010 will be used to conduct a follow-up on particular youths for the program.ConclusionThe PRECEDE-PROCEED model adopted by Fit Kids Families First in designing the obesity prevention intervention is beneficial for summarizing th e work done and insert what aptitude have been done within the PRECEDE-PROCEED model framework. In particular, the explicit anteriority and objective setting was an essential proponent of the model. The model further assisted in determining the facets of the program evaluation.ReferencesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Obesity defend overview. Retrieved April 16, 2006, from http//www.cdc.gov/youthcampaign/overview.htm.Green, L.W., & Kreuter, M.W. (2005). Health program planning An educational and ecological approach (4Th ed.). bracing York McGraw-Hill.Polhamus, B., Dalenius, K., Thompson, D., Scanlon, K., Borland, E., Smith, B., & Grummer- Strawn, L. (2003). Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance 2001 Report. Atlanta U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved March 2004 from http//www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/pdf/2001_ped_nutrition_report.pdf.Source document